Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):61. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010061
First Author (Year) Peake (2017) [45]
Title Potential Impact of the 2016 Consensus Definitions of Sepsis and Septic Shock on Future Sepsis Research.
Journal Annals of Emergency Medicine
Reviewer RL, CG, LL
Study sponsor Nil
Study type Post hoc analysis of ARISE database (October 08–April 14)
Location Australasia
Participants
  • Number

  • Male/Female

  • Median age

  • Patient group


1591
59.7/40.3
(Mean 62.9, SD 16.5)
SIRS-positive adults
qSOFA criteria ≥22 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure ≤100 mm Hg, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score <15
Primary outcome
Other outcomes
The proportion of patients enrolled with the SIRS-based criteria that met the new Sepsis-3 definitions for qSOFA, sepsis, and septic shock
their baseline characteristics; interventions delivered; and outcomes, including mortality, duration of organ support, and ICU, and the hospital length of stay
Results
Note Second analysis of ARISE database
Multiple imputation for Sn, Sp, PPV, and NPV