Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):61. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010061

Table 2.

Risk of bias across the studies.

Author Year Selection Bias Bias in Definition and Measurement Outcome Measurement Bias Handling of Missing Data Confounding Bias of Statistics or Presentation of Result
Amland et al. 2017
April et al. 2016
Askim et al. 2017
Boulos et al. 2017
Brabrand et al. 2016
Burnham et al. 2018
Chen et al. 2016
Churpek et al. 2017
de Groot et al. 2017
Donnelly et al. 2017
Du et al. 2017
Finkelsztein et al. 2017
Forward et al. 2017
Freund et al. 2016
Giamarellos-Bourboulis et al. 2016
Gonzalez del Castillo et al. 2017
Guirgis et al. 2017
Haydar et al. 2017
Henning et al. 2017
Ho et al. 2016
Hu et al. 2017
Hwang et al. 2018
Innocenti et al. 2016
Khwannimit et al. 2018
Kim et al. 2017
Kolditz et al. 2016
LeGuen et al. 2017
Moskowitz et al. 2017
Muller et al. 2017
Park et al. 2017
Peake et al. 2017
Quinten et al. 2017
Raith et al. 2017
Rannikko et al. 2017
Ranzani et al. 2017
Seymour et al. 2016
Siddiqui et al. 2017
Singer et al. 2016
Sterling et al. 2017
Szakmany et al. 2018
Tusgul et al. 2017
Umemura et al. 2017
Wang J et al. 2016
Wang S et al. 2017
Williams et al. 2016

Green, low risk; Yellow, moderate risk; Red, high risk.