Skip to main content
. 2019 Winter;7(1):71–83. doi: 10.22038/AOJNMB.2018.11610

Table 5.

Comparison of the results of beta absorbed dose from this study and those by equations presented by Amato et al. (9)

Absorbed dose (µGy/MBqs)
Volume=6.28 (cm 3 )
Volume=67.03 (cm 3 )
Volume=753.97 (cm 3 )
Radionuclide
Diff. (%) Equations presented by Amato et al. This study Diff. (%) Equations presented by Ama This study Diff. (%) Equations presented by Amato et al. This study
-6.61 2.706 2.527 -8.49 0. 259 0. 237 -8.69 0.023 0.021 14C
8.57 2.123 1.941 -9.00 0. 200 0. 182 -11.11 0.018 0.016 199Au
-7.87 3.212 2.959 -9.18 0. 305 0. 277 -7.41 0.027 0.025 177Lu
-7.00 4.341 4.037 -8.91 0. 415 0. 378 -8.11 0. 037 0.034 131I
-6.99 4.673 4.346 -8.94 0. 447 0. 407 -10.00 0.040 0.036 90Sr
-5.92 5.368 5.050 -8.68 0. 518 0. 473 -8.69 0.046 0.042 153Sm
-2.31 7.450 7.278 -7.58 0. 738 0. 682 -8.95 0.067 0.061 186Re
9.03 14.102 15.376 -4.37 1.507 1.441 -8.57 0. 140 0. 128 32P
21.44 17.024 20.675 -0. 51 1.948 1.938 -7.02 0. 185 0. 172 90Y
73.08 19.584 33.897 18.15 2.689 3.177 -1.05 0. 285 0. 282 38Cl
93.36 23.641 45.714 24.17 3.451 4.285 -1.06 0. 377 0. 381 88Rb