Table 4.
Association between RRFB activation and failure of any motor vehicle to stop in each lane of traffic at greenway street crossings in logistic regression models.
| RRFB Activation | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| No Clustering | ||||||
| Cyclist | 5.12 | 2.86–9.16 | 5.49 | 3.01–10.01 | 5.63 | 3.07–10.36 |
| Pedestrian | 1.04 | 0.37–2.91 | 1.13 | 0.40–3.19 | 1.08 | 0.38–3.10 |
| Clustering Within Lane, Street | ||||||
| Cyclist | 5.05 | 2.41–10.57 | 5.52 | 2.57–11.86 | 5.70 | 2.70–12.05 |
| Pedestrian | 1.05 | 0.44–2.52 | 1.13 | 0.46–2.75 | 1.09 | 0.43–2.73 |
| Clustering Within Crossing, Street | ||||||
| Cyclist | 5.36 | 2.79–10.31 | 5.76 | 3.01–10.99 | 5.88 | 3.06–11.30 |
| Pedestrian | 1.06 | 0.43–2.59 | 1.14 | 0.46–2.82 | 1.10 | 0.44–2.74 |
RRFB, rectangular rapid flash beacon. CI, confidence interval. OR, odds ratio. Model 1: Unadjusted. Model 2: Adjusted for street and lane motor vehicle behavior scores. Model 3: Adjusted for street and lane motor vehicle behavior score, with period indicators used to accommodate linear and quadratic period effects.