Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 12;16(2):201. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020201

Table 5.

Association between RRFB activation and count of motor vehicles failing to stop in each lane of traffic at greenway street crossings in negative binomial regression models.

RRFB Activation Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
β SE p-Value β SE p-Value β SE p-Value
No Clustering
  Cyclist 1.483 0.194 <0.0001 1.468 0.205 <0.0001 1.430 0.213 <0.0001
  Pedestrian −0.037 0.434 0.93 0.028 0.435 0.95 −0.034 0.438 0.94
Clustering Within Lane, Street
  Cyclist 1.408 0.199 <0.0001 1.470 0.210 <0.0001 1.442 0.204 <0.0001
  Pedestrian −0.023 0.340 0.95 0.028 0.370 0.94 −0.033 0.385 0.93
Clustering Within Crossing, Street
  Cyclist 1.515 0.219 <0.0001 1.503 0.206 <0.0001 1.464 0.214 <0.0001
  Pedestrian −0.028 0.344 0.94 0.026 0.343 0.94 −0.033 0.343 0.92

RRFB, rectangular rapid flash beacon. SE, standard error. Model 1: Unadjusted. Model 2: Adjusted for street and lane motor vehicle behavior scores. Model 3: Adjusted for street and lane motor vehicle behavior score, with period indicators to accommodate linear and quadratic period effects.