Table 2.

Hazard ratios (HRs) for association of mortality with relative deprivation in multiple-imputed dataset ^a,b.

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
	HR (95%CI)	HR (95%CI)	HR (95%CI)
Relative poverty
Non-poverty	ref.	ref.
Poverty	1.26 * (1.02–1.56)	1.22 † (0.98–1.53)
Relative deprivation c
Non-deprivation		ref.
1		1.14 (0.87–1.49)
2 +		1.71 ** (1.18–2.48)
Combination d
No dep. & pov.			ref.
Poverty only			1.22 † (0.98–1.52)
Deprivation only			1.86 † (0.92–3.76)
Pov. & dep.			1.87 * (1.14–3.09)

** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p < 0.10. HR: hazard ratio, 95%CI: 95% confidence interval. ^a Multiple imputation by chained equations was performed using relative deprivation index, relative poverty, sex, age, years of education, marital status, disease and/or impairment, self-recognition of forgetfulness, depressive symptoms (m = 20). ^b Sex, age, years of education, marital status, disease and/or impairment, self-recognition of forgetfulness, and depressive symptoms were controlled. ^c This index was assessed by counting the number of items. ^d Relative deprivation in combination variable was defined as respondents who fell under two and over deprivation index. Proportions of each category were as follows: No dep. & pov.: 70.1%; poverty only: 27.0%; deprivation only: 1.1%; and pov. & dep.: 1.7%. In addition, the proportion is not coincident with other tables, because it was confined to the respondents which answered the relative deprivation and poverty index.