Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 30;2(4):pky080. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky080

Table 3.

Multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for digestive system cancer risk in quintiles of the ELIH scores among men and women*,,

Anatomic location of cancer Quintile 1 (reference) Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 Ptrend§
Total digestive system
 Men, cases (n = 2170) 358 367 410 435 600
 Men, HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.03 (0.89 to 1.19) 1.12 (0.97 to 1.29) 1.19 (1.03 to 1.37) 1.62 (1.41 to 1.85) <.001
 Women, cases (n = 2445) 427 420 484 524 590
 Women, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.98 (0.86 to 1.12) 1.08 (0.95 to 1.23) 1.14 (1.00 to 1.30) 1.35 (1.19 to 1.53) <.001
 No. cases 927 949 973 897 868
 Pooled HR (95% CI)‖ 1.00 1.00 (0.91 to 1.11) 1.09 (0.99 to 1.21) 1.16 (1.06 to 1.28) 1.47 (1.23 to 1.76) <.001
Digestive tract
 Men, cases (n = 1716) 275 287 326 345 483
 Men, HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.05 (0.89 to 1.24) 1.15 (0.98 to 1.36) 1.23 (1.05 to 1.45) 1.71 (1.47 to 1.99) <.001
 Women, cases (n = 1859) 337 308 379 387 448
 Women, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.92 (0.79 to 1.07) 1.07 (0.93 to 1.24) 1.08 (0.93 to 1.25) 1.30 (1.13 to 1.50) <.001
 No. cases 718 713 740 716 694
 Pooled HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.98 (0.86 to 1.11) 1.11 (0.99 to 1.24) 1.15 (1.01 to 1.31) 1.49 (1.14 to 1.95) .001
Mouth/pharynx to small intestine
 Men, cases (n = 488) 73 91 105 88 131
 Men, HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.21 (0.89 to 1.66) 1.41 (1.04 to 1.90) 1.18 (0.86 to 1.61) 1.64 (1.23 to 2.20) .002
 Women, cases (n = 427) 81 56 87 94 109
 Women, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.72 (0.51 to 1.02) 1.07 (0.79 to 1.45) 1.13 (0.84 to 1.53) 1.39 (1.03 to 1.86) .001
 No. cases 174 192 179 188 183
 Pooled HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.94 (0.57 to 1.57) 1.23 (0.94 to 1.61) 1.15 (0.93 to 1.43) 1.51 (1.23 to 1.86) <.001
Stomach
 Men, cases (n = 126) 19 27 28 21 31
 Men, HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.44 (0.80 to 2.61) 1.45 (0.80 to 2.61) 1.18 (0.63 to 2.22) 1.62 (0.90 to 2.89) .21
 Women, cases (n = 118) 21 23 27 23 24
 Women, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.64 (0.32 to 1.30) 1.05 (0.57 to 1.92) 1.13 (0.62 to 2.05) 1.64 (0.94 to 2.87) .01
 No. cases 38 55 49 53 49
 Pooled HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.99 (0.45 to 2.17) 1.24 (0.81 to 1.88) 1.15 (0.75 to 1.78) 1.63 (1.09 to 2.44) .007
Colorectum
 Men, cases (n = 1232) 203 198 220 258 353
 Men, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.99 (0.82 to 1.21) 1.06 (0.87 to 1.28) 1.26 (1.04 to 1.52) 1.74 (1.46 to 2.07) <.001
 Women, cases (n = 1439) 257 253 293 294 342
 Women, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.98 (0.82 to 1.17) 1.08 (0.91 to 1.27) 1.06 (0.90 to 1.26) 1.28 (1.09 to 1.51) <.001
 No. cases 547 523 561 532 513
 Pooled HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.99 (0.87 to 1.12) 1.07 (0.94 to 1.21) 1.15 (0.97 to 1.36) 1.49 (1.10 to 2.01) .02
Digestive accessory organs
 Men, cases (n = 454) 83 80 84 90 117
 Men, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.96 (0.70 to 1.30) 1.02 (0.75 to 1.38) 1.07 (0.79 to 1.45) 1.33 (1.00 to 1.78) .02
 Women, cases (n = 586) 90 112 105 137 142
 Women, HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.21 (0.92 to 1.60) 1.10 (0.83 to 1.46) 1.37 (1.04 to 1.79) 1.51 (1.15 to 1.98) .001
 No. cases 219 236 233 181 164
 Pooled HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.09 (0.86 to 1.37) 1.06 (0.86 to 1.30) 1.22 (0.97 to 1.55) 1.43 (1.17 to 1.73) <.001
Pancreas
 Men, cases (n = 346) 66 66 66 66 82
 Men, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.99 (0.70 to 1.40) 0.99 (0.70 to 1.39) 0.97 (0.69 to 1.38) 1.16 (0.84 to 1.62) .37
 Women, cases (n = 494) 77 94 94 99 130
 Women, HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.21 (0.90 to 1.64) 1.19 (0.88 to 1.61) 1.18 (0.88 to 1.60) 1.69 (1.27 to 2.26) <.001
 No. cases 182 200 174 148 139
 Pooled HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.11 (0.88 to 1.39) 1.10 (0.87 to 1.38) 1.09 (0.87 to 1.36) 1.42 (0.98 to 2.04) .047
Liver and gallbladder
 Men, cases (n = 108) 17 14 18 24 35
 Men, HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.83 (0.40 to 1.69) 1.12 (0.57 to 2.18) 1.48 (0.79 to 2.78) 2.02 (1.12 to 3.65) .002
 Women, cases (n = 169) 26 28 24 51 40
 Women, HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.03 (0.60 to 1.77) 0.83 (0.48 to 1.46) 1.74 (1.08 to 2.80) 1.41 (0.85 to 2.33) .03
 No. cases 56 54 65 54 50
 Pooled HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.95 (0.62 to 1.46) 0.94 (0.61 to 1.44) 1.64 (1.12 to 2.40) 1.64 (1.11 to 2.40) .001
*

ELIH scores were adjusted for total energy intake using the residual method. Lower scores indicate insulin sensitive lifestyles, and higher scores indicate hyperinsulinemic lifestyles. CI = confidence interval; ELIH = empirical lifestyle index for hyperinsulinemia; HR = hazard ratio; NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Heterogeneity for risk was tested using duplication method cause-specific Cox regression analyses.

All analyses were adjusted for the following potential confounding variables: race, family history of cancer, history of endoscopy, multivitamin use, total alcohol intake, pack-years of smoking, regular aspirin use, regular NSAIDs use, and additionally for menopausal status, and postmenopausal hormone use in women.

§

The P value for linear trend across ELIH quintiles was the P value of the ordinal variable constructed by assigning quintile medians to all participants in the quintile. Models for linear trend were adjusted for all covariates listed in footnote previously.

HR were pooled using random effects meta-analysis (all such values).