Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 13;27(2):93–99. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1214-1

Table 3.

Aortic valve procedures and additional procedures

N = 439 BAV
(n = 140)
TAV
(n = 299)
Crude OR
(95% CI)
Adjusted ORa
(95% CI)
I. Aortic valve procedures
Isolated valve prosthesisb, n (%) 104 (74) 275 (92) 0.25 (0.14–0.44)   0.49 (0.26–0.92)
– Bentall procedure, n (%)  28 (20)*  19 (6.4) 3.68 (1.98–6.87)
– Aortic root replacementc, n (%)   2 (1.4)   2 (0.7) 2.15 (0.30–15.4)
– Other aortic valve proceduresd, n (%)   6 (4.3)   3 (1.0) 4.42 (1.09–17.9)
II. Additional procedures
CABG, n (%)  20 (14) 118 (39) 0.26 (0.15–0.43)   0.45 (0.25–0.83)
SCAR, n (%)   8 (5.7)   5 (1.7) 3.56 (1.14–11.1)
Arch replacement, n (%)  11 (7.9)   8 (2.7) 3.10 (1.21–7.89)
Other aortic surgerye, n (%)   7 (5.0)*   8 (2.7) 1.63 (0.55–4.79)
Mitral and/or tricuspid surgery, n (%)  11 (7.9)  41 (14) 0.54 (0.27–1.79)
Other cardiac surgeryf, n (%)   8 (5.7)  29 (9.7) 0.56 (0.25–1.27)
III. ‘Proximal aortic surgery’  44 (31)  34 (11) 3.57 (2.16–5.92) 2.3 (1.3–4.0)

BAV bicuspid aortic valve, CABG coronary artery bypass grafting, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, SCAR supracoronary ascending replacement, TAV tricuspid aortic valve

*P < 0.001; ‡ numbers too small for multivariable analysis

aAdjusted for age at surgery, gender, years since surgery, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes

bMechanical or biological

cTwo cases of endocarditis and two cases of elective homograft by choice

dHomograft (n = 2), autograft (n = 4), valvuloplasty (n = 3)

eAscending aorta reefing/patch enlargement

fCongenital correction (n = 8), rhythm surgery (n = 16), Morrow procedure (n = 3), myxoma, and various patch-plasties