Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Feb;143(2):503–510. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005196

Table 4 -.

Secondary Analysis: Multivariable Regression Analysis to Elucidate Factors Affecting Surgical Encounter Total Direct Costs

Factor Relative Costab P - Value
Coefficient 95% Confidence Interval
Age (years)b 1.00 (1.00 • 1.01) 0.36
Anesthesia Type
  Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) Reference Category - -
  General 1.31 (1.04 • 1.65) < 0.05
  Surgical block + MAC 0.92 (0.72 • 1.17) 0.49
Provider
  A Reference Category - -
  B 1.61 (1.37 • 1.89) < 0.05
  C 1.26 (1.07 • 1.48) 0.33
  D 1.21 (1.04 • 1.42) 0.65
Sex
  Female Reference Category - -
  Male 0.96 (0.86 • 1.06) 0.43
Surgical Method
  In situ decompression (ISD) Reference Category - -
  Transposition (SQT and SMT) 1.18 (1.04 • 1.35) < 0.05
a

Relative Cost (RC): Gamma univariate regression coefficients (eβ). For example, a value of 1.6 is interpereted as a 60% increase in total direct costs as compared to the reference category. Bolded p-values were determined to be statistically-significant.

b

Note that anesthesia type and surgical methods are associated due to clinical practice patterns in which ISD is more likely to be performed under MAC, and transpositions performed under general anesthesia. By including both predictors, the effect of surgical method may be falsely lowered.

c

Per additional 1 year of age.