Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 1;199(1):71–82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0190OC

Table 1.

Association of Respiratory Phenotypes with Variables Used in Clustering Algorithm*

  LW-LA (n = 117) LW-HA (n = 81) TW-LA (n = 75) HW-LA (n = 101) HW-HA (n = 68) P Value
Any wheezing            
 Low/minimal 100 (85.5) 57 (70.4) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) <0.01
 Early decrease 9 (7.69) 10 (12.3) 71 (94.7) 1 (0.99) 0 (0.00)
 Late decrease 6 (5.13) 7 (8.64) 4 (5.33) 25 (24.8) 16 (23.5)
 Frequent and persistent 2 (1.71) 7 (8.64) 0 (0.00) 75 (74.3) 52 (76.5)
Number of wheezing illnesses            
 Low/minimal 117 (100) 74 (91.4) 2 (2.67) 0 (0.00) 2 (2.94) <0.01
 Early resolution 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 67 (89.3) 3 (2.97) 2 (2.94)
 Infrequent (and decreasing over time) 0 (0.00) 4 (4.94) 6 (8.00) 70 (69.3) 46 (67.6)
 Frequent and persistent 0 (0.00) 3 (3.70) 0 (0.00) 28 (27.7) 18 (26.5)
Serum aeroallergen-specific IgE
 Low/minimal 104 (88.9) 0 (0.00) 48 (64.0) 82 (81.2) 0 (0.00) <0.01
 Late onset 10 (8.55) 7 (8.64) 4 (5.33) 3 (2.97) 3 (4.41)
 Intermediate 0 (0.00) 60 (74.1) 14 (18.7) 16 (15.8) 19 (27.9)
 Early multiple 3 (2.56) 14 (17.3) 9 (12.0) 0 (0.00) 46 (67.6)
Aeroallergen-specific skin test responses            
 Low/minimal 103 (88.0) 26 (32.1) 58 (77.3) 95 (94.1) 4 (5.88) <0.01
 Intermediate 14 (12.0) 46 (56.8) 15 (20.0) 6 (5.94) 48 (70.6)
 Early multiple 0 (0.00) 9 (11.1) 2 (2.67) 0 (0.00) 16 (23.5)
FEV1/FVC ratio            
 Mean (Years 3–7) 0.91 (0.88–0.94) 0.90 (0.87–0.94) 0.91 (0.88–0.93) 0.90 (0.85–0.95) 0.90 (0.86–0.93) 0.50
 Variability (Years 3–7) 0.09 (0.06–0.11) 0.07 (0.05–0.11) 0.07 (0.05–0.11) 0.09 (0.06–0.12) 0.10 (0.08–0.13) <0.01
IOS XA            
 Low 29 (24.8) 18 (22.2) 9 (12.0) 14 (13.9) 9 (13.2) 0.01
 Intermediate 57 (48.7) 46 (56.8) 46 (61.3) 45 (44.6) 31 (45.6)
 High 31 (26.5) 17 (21.0) 20 (26.7) 42 (41.6) 28 (41.2)

Definition of abbreviations: HA = high atopy; HW = high wheeze; IOS = impulse oscillometry; LA = low atopy; LW = low wheeze; TW = transient wheeze; XA = area of reactance.

*

Values are counts (percentages) or medians (interquartile range).

Chi-square for categorical data, F test for continuous data.

For FEV1/FVC ratio we were unable to obtain a trajectory solution. Instead, these data were analyzed as continuous variables rather than group trajectories. To account for both the overall average and its variability over the last 4 years, for each participant, we derived his/her mean and its SD, which are presented under mean and variability.