Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 24;2015(3):CD010824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010824.pub2
Study characteristics Eligibility criteria Y/N or unclear Details and location
Type of study Randomized controlled trial        
Controlled clinical trial
(quasi‐randomized trial and cluster‐randomized trial)
       
Participants
 
Adults > 16 years undergoing electrical cardioversion in the emergency or elective setting         
Types of intervention and comparison
We will include studies comparing 2 different anaesthetic agents or different doses of the same agent
Groups may include the additional use of an analgesic (e.g. fentanyl, alfentanil) by its use alone or by dose
 
 
Comparison of 1 of:        
intravenous anaesthetic agents (e.g. etomidate, propofol, thiopentone, methohexital);  
inhaled anaesthetic agents (e.g. isoflurane, sevoflurane);  
sedative agents (e.g. midazolam, diazepam) via any route (intramuscular, subcutaneous, intravenous, rectal); or  
analgesic (e.g. fentanyl, alfentanil).  
With one of:  
intravenous anaesthetic agents (e.g. etomidate, propofol, thiopentone, methohexital);  
inhaled anaesthetic agents (e.g. isoflurane, sevoflurane); or  
sedative agents (e.g. midazolam, diazepam) via any route (intramuscular, subcutaneous, intravenous, rectal).