Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;2019(1):CD011825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2

Comparison 12. Deaths.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Deaths ‐ overall 52 216246 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.87, 1.06]
2 Deaths ‐ subgroup analysis by type of macrolide 52 216246 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.87, 1.06]
2.1 Azithromycin 24 204719 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.85, 1.10]
2.2 Clarithromycin 8 7216 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.59, 1.24]
2.3 Erythromycin 10 718 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.38, 1.40]
2.4 Roxithromycin 10 3593 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.76, 1.41]
3 Deaths ‐ subgroup analysis by route of administration 51 214875 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.87, 1.06]
3.1 Intravenous 8 1334 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.63, 1.10]
3.2 Peroral 43 213541 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.88, 1.10]