Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;2019(1):CD011825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2

Amer 2006.

Methods Design: randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial
Participants Number assigned: 49 children (macrolide n = 25, placebo n = 24)
Age in years (mean): macrolide: 8.0, placebo: 8.4
Setting: secondary care
Interventions Indication: pityriasis rosea
Type of macrolide: azithromycin
Route: per oral
Dose per day: 500 mg (maximum)
Duration of treatment: 5 days
Total treatment dose: 2500 mg (maximum)
Outcomes Adverse events stated as an outcome in trial registration/protocol/paper: unclear
Adverse events ascertainment: participant asked
Adverse events: data reported
Antimicrobial resistance: not reported
Death: not reported
Funding sources Study supported by a grant from Pfizer Inc.
Notes Concomitant medication: unclear
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Sequence generation not described in detail.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Identical‐appearing placebo
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of both participants and clinicians
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No dropout
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Adverse events not clearly stated as an outcome. However, standardised ascertainment of adverse events at each follow‐up visit and adverse events reported.
Other bias Low risk None were identified.