Amer 2006.
Methods | Design: randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial | |
Participants |
Number assigned: 49 children (macrolide n = 25, placebo n = 24) Age in years (mean): macrolide: 8.0, placebo: 8.4 Setting: secondary care |
|
Interventions |
Indication: pityriasis rosea Type of macrolide: azithromycin Route: per oral Dose per day: 500 mg (maximum) Duration of treatment: 5 days Total treatment dose: 2500 mg (maximum) |
|
Outcomes |
Adverse events stated as an outcome in trial registration/protocol/paper: unclear Adverse events ascertainment: participant asked Adverse events: data reported Antimicrobial resistance: not reported Death: not reported |
|
Funding sources | Study supported by a grant from Pfizer Inc. | |
Notes | Concomitant medication: unclear | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Sequence generation not described in detail. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Identical‐appearing placebo |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of both participants and clinicians |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No dropout |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Adverse events not clearly stated as an outcome. However, standardised ascertainment of adverse events at each follow‐up visit and adverse events reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | None were identified. |