Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;2019(1):CD011825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2

Amland 1995.

Methods Design: randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial
Participants Number assigned: 339 children, adults, and elderly (macrolide n = 171, placebo n = 168)
Age in years mean (range): male: macrolide: 30 (7 to 85), placebo: 28 (6 to 84); female: macrolide 33 (6 to 84), placebo: 33 (7 to 82)
Setting: secondary care
Interventions Indication: prevention of postoperative wound infections
Type of macrolide: azithromycin
Route: per oral
Dose per day: 1000 mg (maximum)
Duration of treatment: 1 day
Total treatment dose: 1000 mg (maximum)
Outcomes Adverse events stated as an outcome in trial registration/protocol/paper: no
Adverse events ascertainment: unclear
Adverse events: data reported
Antimicrobial resistance: not reported
Death: not reported
Funding sources None stated. Reports that the study was supported by Pfizer, who provided the study medication
Notes Concomitant medication: yes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was performed in blocks of 10 using a computer‐generated chart.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central allocation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Placebo not described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear if participants and clinicians were blinded to treatment groups
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Low dropout, similar across groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Adverse events not stated as an outcome, unclear ascertainment. However, adverse events reported.
Other bias Low risk None were identified.