Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;2019(1):CD011825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2

King 1996.

Methods Design: randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial
Participants Number assigned: 91 adults (macrolide n = 49, placebo n = 42)
Age in years (mean ± SD): macrolide: 36.0 ± 13, placebo: 38.2 ± 14.5
Setting: primary care
Interventions Indication: acute bronchitis
Type of macrolide: erythromycin
Route: per oral
Dose per day: 1000 mg
Duration of treatment: 10 days
Total treatment dose: 10,000 mg
Outcomes Adverse events stated as an outcome in trial registration/protocol/paper: unclear
Adverse events ascertainment: participant asked
Adverse events: data reported
Antimicrobial resistance: not reported
Death: not reported
Funding sources Study supported by the Division of Primary Care of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Authors acknowledge supplying company (Parke‐Davis, Morris Plane, New Jersey).
Notes Concomitant medication: yes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Identical‐appearing placebo.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and clinicians.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk > 20% lost to follow‐up, unclear from which groups.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Adverse events were stated clearly as an outcome. Standardised ascertainment and adverse events presented.
Other bias Low risk None were reported.