King 1996.
Methods | Design: randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial | |
Participants |
Number assigned: 91 adults (macrolide n = 49, placebo n = 42) Age in years (mean ± SD): macrolide: 36.0 ± 13, placebo: 38.2 ± 14.5 Setting: primary care |
|
Interventions |
Indication: acute bronchitis Type of macrolide: erythromycin Route: per oral Dose per day: 1000 mg Duration of treatment: 10 days Total treatment dose: 10,000 mg |
|
Outcomes |
Adverse events stated as an outcome in trial registration/protocol/paper: unclear Adverse events ascertainment: participant asked Adverse events: data reported Antimicrobial resistance: not reported Death: not reported |
|
Funding sources | Study supported by the Division of Primary Care of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Authors acknowledge supplying company (Parke‐Davis, Morris Plane, New Jersey). | |
Notes | Concomitant medication: yes | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random number table. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Identical‐appearing placebo. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and clinicians. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | > 20% lost to follow‐up, unclear from which groups. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Adverse events were stated clearly as an outcome. Standardised ascertainment and adverse events presented. |
Other bias | Low risk | None were reported. |