Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;2019(1):CD011825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2

Wong 2012.

Methods Design: randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group trial
Participants Number assigned: 141 adults and elderly (macrolide n = 71, placebo n = 70)
Age in years (mean ± SD): macrolide: 60.9 ± 13.6, placebo: 59.0 ± 13.3
Setting: secondary care
Interventions Indication: non‐cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Type of macrolide: azithromycin
Route: per oral
Dose: 500 mg 3 times a week
Duration of treatment: 6 months
Total treatment dose: 39,000 mg
Outcomes Adverse events stated as an outcome in trial registration/protocol/paper: yes
Adverse events ascertainment: participant asked
Adverse events: data reported
Antimicrobial resistance: reported on participants diagnosed with macrolide‐resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae following macrolide treatment
Death: not reported
Funding sources Study funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand and the Auckland District Health Board Charitable Trust.
Notes Concomitant medication: yes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central allocation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Identical‐appearing placebo
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants, clinicians, and investigators blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 6% in macrolide group versus 10% in placebo group withdrew. However, reasons for dropout are clearly presented.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Adverse events stated as an outcome, standardised ascertainment, and adverse events reported. Note that only adverse events with an incidence of more than 2.5% in either group were presented.
Other bias Low risk None were identified.