Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;2016(5):CD007126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007126.pub3

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Proportion of participants experiencing at least 50% of maximum pain relief at 4 hours.

IV paracetamol/propacetamol compared to placebo or other analgesics for postoperative pain
Patient or population: patients with postoperative pain
 Settings: hospital
 Intervention: IV paracetamol/propacetamol
 Comparison: placebo or other analgesics
Comparison Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Placebo or other analgesics IV paracetamol/propacetamol
Para/propacetamol vs placebo
 see footnote1 156 per 1000 394 per 1000
 (313 to 497) RR 2.53 
 (2.01 to 3.19) 1149
 (11 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 high2,3
Paracetamol vs placebo
 see footnote1 66 per 1000 317 per 1000
 (152 to 661) RR 4.8 
 (2.3 to 10) 393
 (5 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate2,3,4
Propacetamol vs placebo
 see footnote1 188 per 1000 411 per 1000
 (327 to 520) RR 2.19 
 (1.74 to 2.77) 756
 (8 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate2,3,4
Para/propacetamol vs NSAIDs
 see footnote1 599 per 1000 605 per 1000
 (515 to 707) RR 1.01 
 (0.86 to 1.18) 353
 (5 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low4,5
Paracetamol vs NSAIDs
 see footnote1 631 per 1000 568 per 1000
 (454 to 713) RR 0.9 
 (0.72 to 1.13) 130
 (2 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low4,5,6
Propacetamol vs NSAIDs
 see footnote1 577 per 1000 624 per 1000
 (496 to 774) RR 1.08 
 (0.86 to 1.34) 223
 (3 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low2,4,5,6
Paracetamol vs propacetamol
 see footnote1 428 per 1000 419 per 1000
 (329 to 530) RR 0.98 
 (0.77 to 1.24) 361
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate4
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; IV: intravenous; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; RR: risk ratio; SPID = summed pain intensity difference; TOTPAR = total pain relief; VAS: visual analog scale
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1TOTPAR or SPID using either VAS or categorical data, and calculating their corresponding percentage of theoretical maximum TOTPAR and SPID.
 2Considerable unexplained heterogeneity exists between studies.
 3Large effect.
 4Total # events < 300.
 5Different NSAIDs studied.
 6Wide confidence interval that includes no effect and appreciable benefit and/or harm.