Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;2016(5):CD007126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007126.pub3

1. Publication bias risk assessment: efficacy outcomes.

Comparison/outcome Number of studies Number of participants n with outcome/total % with outcome Risk difference NNT Susceptibility to publication bias
      Active Control Active Control      
Comparison 1. Number of participants with > 50% pain relief over 4 hours
1 Paracetamol or propacetamol vs placebo 11 1149 250/687 72/462 36 16 0.23 (0.18 to 0.27) 5 1492
1.1 Paracetamol vs placebo 5 393 84/272 8/121 31 7 0.24 (0.17 to 0.31) 5 549
1.2 Propacetamol vs placebo 8 756 166/415 64/341 40 19 0.22 (0.17 to 0.27) 5 906
Comparison 2. Number of participants with > 50% pain relief over 6 hours
1 Paracetamol or propacetamol vs placebo 10 1143 200/708 42/435 28 10 0.18 (0.14 to 0.22) 6 913
1.1 Paracetamol vs placebo 6 532 109/364 14/168 30 8 0.22 (0.16 to 0.29) 5 637
1.2 Propacetamol vs placebo 6 611 91/344 28/267 26 10 0.15 (0.10 0.20) 7 305
2. Paracetamol or propacetamol vs NSAIDs 5 355 95/192 103/163 50 63 ‐0.13 (‐0.23 to ‐0.03) 8* 107
Comparison 5. Number of participants requiring rescue medication
1 Paracetamol or propacetamol vs placebo 9 859 295/476 314/383 62 82 ‐0.25 (‐0.30 to ‐0.19) 4 1289
1.1 Paracetamol vs placebo 6 655 267/376 249/279 71 89 ‐0.22 (‐0.28 to ‐0.17) 5 785
1.2 Propacetamol vs placebo 3 204 31/100 65/104 31 62 ‐0.32 (‐0.44 to ‐0.19) 4 449
Comparison 9. Global evaluation rated as good/satisfied or excellent/very satisfied
1 Paracetamol or propacetamol vs placebo 16 2015 787/1100 529/915 72 58 0.19 (0.15 to 0.23) 6 1816
1.1 Paracetamol vs placebo 9 876 355/508 207/368 70 56 0.24 (0.19 to 0.29) 5 1225
1.2 Propacetamol vs placebo 9 1139 432/592 322/547 73 59 0.15 (0.10 to 0.21) 7 569
2. Paracetamol or propacetamol vs NSAIDs 11 795 306/410 313/385 75 81 ‐0.06 (‐0.11 to ‐4.81) 17* NNT > 10

*NSAID superior