Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;2016(5):CD007126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007126.pub3

Landwehr 2005.

Methods Randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐ and active‐controlled
Medications administered 30 min before arrival in the recovery area
Participants Type of surgery: retinal
Propacetamol group
Entered/completing: 12/12
Age (mean, SD): 52 ± 18
Sex (male, %): 67
Metamizole group
Entered/completing: 13/13
Age (mean, SD): 60 ± 19
Sex (male, %): 31? (data reported in error)
Placebo group
Entered/completing: 13/13
Age (mean, SD): 58 ± 22
Sex (male, %): 69
Interventions Intervention: 1 g paracetamol in 100 ml over 15 min
Active control: 1 g metamizol
Placebo: 100 ml normal saline
Outcomes Pain intensity at rest and on coughing (VRS, VAS)
Opioid consumption (tilidine)
Patient satisfaction (categorical)
Source of funding The study was in part financed by a grant from Bristol‐Myers Squibb GmbH, München, Germany
Were treatment groups comparable at baseline? Yes: demographics
Details of preoperative pain Not reported
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated code
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Code prepared at a remote site and sealed in sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Infusions were made to look identical
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 5 participants in placebo group had incomplete data, imputed by LOCF. It appears that all other participants contributed data at all time points for all outcomes.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes from Methods section reported in Results section. Some adverse event data listed only as P values.
Size High risk Fewer than 50 participants per arm of the study (12 propacetamol, 13 metamizole, 13 placebo)