Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;2016(5):CD007126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007126.pub3

Marty 2005.

Methods Randomized, single dose, double‐blind, active‐controlled parallel‐group
Medication administered when baseline pain reached moderate‐to‐severe intensity
Participants Type of surgery: gynecological
Paracetamol group
Entered/completing: 80/80
Age (mean, SD): 38.3 ± 12.8
Sex (male, %): 0
Propacetamol group
Entered/completing: 81/81
Age (mean, SD): 33.9 ± 12.0
Sex (male, %): 0
Interventions Intervention: paracetamol 1g IV in 100 ml solution over 15 min
Active control: propacetamol 2 g in 100 ml solution
Outcomes Primary outcome: tolerability, including pain at infusion site
Pain intensity (VRS, VAS)
Number of participants requesting rescue medication
Patient satisfaction (categorical)
Source of funding Not mentioned, but senior author was employee of Bristol Myers Squibb
Were treatment groups comparable at baseline? Yes: weight, type of surgery, baseline pain intensity at surgical site. No ‐ age: 38.3 paracetamol versus 33.9 propacetamol.
Details of preoperative pain Patients with any painful physical condition (other than postoperative pain) were excluded.
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio according to a computer‐generated list of numbers to either group
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Study drugs mixed by pharmacist or nurse not involved in the study, were administered as a 100 ml solution infused over 15 min
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk "A total of 163 women were enrolled and 161 received the single infusion of study medication. All remaining 161 patients including 2 patients (1 in each group) who did not meet eligibility criteria, were included in the ITT population and analyses of demographic characteristics, tolerability, and efficacy". Not clear if data were imputed.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Free of selective reporting. All outcomes from Methods section reported in Results section.
Size Unclear risk 50 to 199 participants per arm of the study (80 paracetamol, 81 propacetamol)