Mitra 2012.
Methods | Randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group controlled trial, multiple dose, active‐controlled. First dose after spinal block regression to T10. | |
Participants | Type of surgery: cesarean section Paracetamol group Entered/completing: 101/101 Age (mean, SD): 25.92 ± 3.09 Sex (male, %): 0 Tramadol group Entered/completing: 103/103 Age (mean, SD): 26.04 ± 3.65 Sex (male, %): 0 |
|
Interventions | Diclofenac 100 mg suppository for all participants starting at the ‘end of surgery’ and every 8 h for 24 h Paracetamol IV in 10 cc of NS (no mention of injection time), 1 g every 6 h beginning at block regression to T10 Tramadol 75 mg IV in 10 cc NS per the above protocol |
|
Outcomes | Primary: summed pain intensities during the entire observation period, calculated as the sum of time‐weighted pain intensity scores as an area under the curve (AUC). NRS at rest and movement at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 h Secondary: use of supplementary rescue analgesic (pethidine 30 mg IV, administered if the participant’s NRS scores > 4) |
|
Source of funding | Grant received from the Department of Science & Technology (DST), Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India | |
Were treatment groups comparable at baseline? | Yes ‐ age BMI, surgical duration, blood loss, NRS at rest and movement. No ‐ BP and HR lower in acetaminophen group | |
Details of preoperative pain | Participants receiving long‐term analgesics were excluded | |
Notes | Primary analysis plan was not pursued because of a non normal distribution of pain scores. Instead medians and interquartile ranges were reported and compared for each time point at rest and at movement. This includes time at 4 h. Use of rescue medications over the entire time period was summarized without specific information as to the time for request. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Using computer‐generated random number tables |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Coded, sealed, opaque envelopes |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Both the test drugs (tramadol and acetaminophen) were drawn up in similar (Dispovan, Faridabad, Haryana, India) 10 ml coded syringes and diluted with normal saline so as to make the final volume of injection to 10 ml. Participants and assessors were blinded to assignment, but blinding success not tested. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes from Methods section reported in Results section |
Size | Unclear risk | 50 to 199 participants per arm of the study (101 paracetamol, 103 tramadol) |