Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;2016(5):CD007126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007126.pub3

Vuilleumier 1998.

Methods Randomized, double‐blind, active‐controlled
Medications administered at the end of anesthesia
Participants Type of surgery: various elective
Propacetamol group
Entered/completing: 40/38
Age (mean, SD): 39 ± 13
Sex (male, %): 47
Morphine group
Entered/completing: 40/39
Age (mean, SD): 39 ± 14
Sex (male, %): 49
Interventions Intervention: 30 mg/kg propacetamol in 150 ml dextrose 5% over 15 min
Control: 0.2 mg/kg morphine IV
Outcomes Number of patients requiring rescue analgesia (repeat dose of intervention)
Pain intensity (VAS)
Vigilance (trailmaking test)
Source of funding UPSA Laboratories supplied drugs and covered logistical expenses of study
Were treatment groups comparable at baseline? Yes: demographics, duration of anesthesia, type of surgery
Details of preoperative pain Patients taking opioids were excluded
Notes French language paper
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Solutions prepared by third party, but unclear if they appeared identical
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk From the 80 patients 3 were withdrawn. All the remaining 77 patients were included in efficacy analyses.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes from Methods section reported in Results section
Size High risk Fewer than 50 participants per arm of the study (40 propacetamol, 40 morphine)