Vuilleumier 1998.
Methods | Randomized, double‐blind, active‐controlled Medications administered at the end of anesthesia |
|
Participants | Type of surgery: various elective Propacetamol group Entered/completing: 40/38 Age (mean, SD): 39 ± 13 Sex (male, %): 47 Morphine group Entered/completing: 40/39 Age (mean, SD): 39 ± 14 Sex (male, %): 49 |
|
Interventions | Intervention: 30 mg/kg propacetamol in 150 ml dextrose 5% over 15 min Control: 0.2 mg/kg morphine IV |
|
Outcomes | Number of patients requiring rescue analgesia (repeat dose of intervention) Pain intensity (VAS) Vigilance (trailmaking test) |
|
Source of funding | UPSA Laboratories supplied drugs and covered logistical expenses of study | |
Were treatment groups comparable at baseline? | Yes: demographics, duration of anesthesia, type of surgery | |
Details of preoperative pain | Patients taking opioids were excluded | |
Notes | French language paper | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Solutions prepared by third party, but unclear if they appeared identical |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | From the 80 patients 3 were withdrawn. All the remaining 77 patients were included in efficacy analyses. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes from Methods section reported in Results section |
Size | High risk | Fewer than 50 participants per arm of the study (40 propacetamol, 40 morphine) |