Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 28;2018(8):CD012498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012498.pub2

Christensen 2011.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomized, double‐blind, placebo and active controlled, parallel, single dose, multicenter. Efficacy monitored over 24 h postintervention; safety monitored over 9 days postintervention. Intervention administered at first report of moderate to severe postoperative pain.
Participants Type of surgery: third molar extraction (1 or more extractions, 1 of which was a fully or partially impacted mandibular third molar requiring bone removal)
Diclofenac 3.75 mg, 9.4 mg, 18.75 mg, 37.5 mg, and 75 mg groups
Entered/completing: 51/51 for each group
Age (mean, SD): not reported
Sex (male, %): not reported
Placebo group
Entered/completing: 51/51
Age (mean, SD): not reported
Sex (male, %): not reported
Ketorolac group
Entered/completing: 47/47
Age (mean, SD): not reported
Sex (male, %): not reported
Interventions Diclofenac: 3.75 mg, 9.4 mg, 18.75 mg, 37.5 mg, or 75 mg single IV bolus injection over 15 seconds
Placebo: unspecified solution administered in same manner
Ketorolac: 30 mg administered in same manner
Outcomes Primary (as specified in study): TOTPAR over 0 h to 6 h in the ITT population
Secondary:
  • Time‐specific pain relief (VAS and categorical)

  • Peak pain relief (VAS and categorical)

  • SPID over 0 to 2, 0 to 4, 0 to 6, 0 to 8, 0 to 10, 0 to 12, and 0 to 24 hours (VAS and categorical)

  • Time‐specific PID (VAS and categorical)

  • Peak PID (VAS and categorical)

  • Summed pain relief intensity differences (SPRID) over 0 to 2, 0 to 4, 0 to 6, 0 to 8, 0 to 10, 0 to 12, and 0 to 24 hours (VAS and categorical)

  • Time to administration of rescue medication

  • Proportion of patients requiring rescue medication

  • Time to meaningful pain relief

  • Time to perceptible pain relief

  • Patient global evaluation

  • Safety

Source of funding Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA (manufacturers of IV diclofenac, now Hospira, Inc., Lake Forest, IL following acquisition in 2010)
Were treatment groups comparable at baseline? Yes: demographic (age, sex, ethnic origin, height, weight) and clinical (degree of molar impaction, surgical time and trauma, baseline pain) variables
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk “computer‐generated randomization schedule”
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors Low risk “A third party doser who had no contact with patients except when dosing administered study treatment prepared the syringe with appropriate study treatment using a blind label within 1 hour of dosing”
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Intention‐to‐treat analysis performed on all participants for both efficacy and safety. Methods of data imputation not described.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All outcomes specified in methods reported in results. Data and SDs not reported for all dose levels for every outcome.
Sample size High risk 51 participants each in diclofenac group and placebo group, and 47 participants in ketorolac group