Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;2017(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4

9. Results case studies ‐ enclosure.

Enclosure
Noise source Intervention Follow‐up Initial noise level Noise level after Reference ID
Conveyor An enclosure was put over the conveyor at a cost of GBP 2000 and the conveyor speed was changed to reduce jar clashing not reported 96 dB 86 dB HSE 2015
Grinder Enclosure over the grinder not reported 93 dB 85 dB Morata 2015
Not reported Use of an enclosure with acoustical foam to deburring area not reported 104 dB 82 dB
Feeder Enclosing the bowl feeder not reported 116 dB 86 dB Maling 2016
Compressed‐air knives Enclosed machine not reported 91–92 dB Below 85 dB HSE 2013
Glass‐bottle conveyor Enclosed the conveyor noise levels not reported Above 90 dB reduced by 2‐8 dB
Blower machine Enclosed machine using sound‐absorbent panels not reported above 90 Below 90 dB
Bottle‐blowing machines Machine enclosed and segregated not reported 94 dB 89 dB
Hammer mill Enclosed in an acoustic booth not reported 102 dB 87 dB
Rinser‐filler‐capper machine Enclosed machine not reported 85 dB 73 dB
Glass jars clashing together on conveyor Fitted enclosure and changed conveyor speed not reported 96 dB 86 dB
Bottles banging together on filler infeed conveyor Fitted covers over conveyor not reported 96‐100 dB 92 dB
  Number of cases: 12 mean before mean after mean reduction
Noise level (dB) 96.3 dB 85.5 dB 11.8 dB