Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;2017(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4

Berg 2009.

Methods Cluster‐randomised controlled study
Participants Agricultural students involved in farm work
n = 753
USA
34 schools
Interventions Intervention: hearing test yearly, instruction once, 11 mailings at home, free hearing protection plus replacements, use of sound meter
Control: yearly hearing tests plus questionnaires
Outcomes STS with ≥ 10 dB loss at 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear
Median and mean thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 kHz
High‐frequency average (3, 4, 6 kHz) and low‐frequency average (0.5, 1, 2 kHz) thresholds
Bulge depth
3‐year and 16‐year follow‐up
Notes Long‐term
Comparability ‐ intervention/control:
 mean age: intervention 14.5 years, control 14.6 years
 hearing: max. threshold (R or L) at 0.5 kHz intervention md 10 dB/control md 5 dB, at 1, 2, 3, 4 kHz intervention/control md 5 dB, at 6 kHz intervention md 15 dB/control md 10 dB
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
14. Blinding (subjects) High risk no blinding
15. Blinding (outcome assessors) Unclear risk not reported
16. Retrospective unplanned subgroup analyses Low risk no subgroup analysis
17. Follow‐up Low risk RCT
18. Statistical tests Low risk multilevel analysis
19. Compliance Low risk increase in hearing protector use
20. Outcome measures Low risk hearing thresholds, STS
21. Selection bias (population) Low risk RCT
22. Selection bias (time) Low risk RCT
23. Randomization Unclear risk randomisation stated but no method reported
24. Allocation concealment Unclear risk no information provided
25. Adjustment for confounding Low risk adjustment for baseline differences
26. Incomplete outcome data Low risk < 20%