Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;2017(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4

Brink 2002.

Methods CBA study
Participants Automobile workers
 n = 264
 USA
 1 automobile company
Interventions Intervention: wearing hearing protection > 33% of the time; n = 132
 Control: wearing hearing protection < 33% of the time; n = 132
Outcomes Hearing thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 kHz
 14‐year follow‐up
Notes Long‐term
Comparability ‐ intervention/control:
 age: ?
 hearing: ?
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
14. Blinding (subjects) High risk no blinding
15. Blinding (outcome assessors) High risk no blinding
16. Retrospective unplanned subgroup analyses Low risk no additional analyses
17. Follow‐up Unclear risk not reported
18. Statistical tests Low risk ANOVA
19. Compliance Low risk HPD use measured
20. Outcome measures Low risk audiometry quality reported (STS)
21. Selection bias (population) Low risk same population
22. Selection bias (time) Low risk same time
23. Randomization High risk no randomisation
24. Allocation concealment Unclear risk no randomisation, not applicable
25. Adjustment for confounding Unclear risk no difference in age
26. Incomplete outcome data Unclear risk not reported