Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;2017(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4

Pell 1973.

Methods CBA study
 Prospective
Participants Various workers
 n = 1572
 n = 628 < 20 dB hearing loss at entrance
 n = 559 15‐35 dB hearing loss at entrance
 n = 385 > 40 dB hearing loss at entrance
 USA
 1 company
Interventions Intervention: HLPP mainly hearing protection; n = 399
 Control: non‐exposed colleagues; n = 1173
Outcomes Average change in hearing thresholds last‐entrance measurement at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 kHz
 5‐year follow‐up
Notes Long‐term
Comparability ‐ intervention/control:
 average age: intervention ‐ 34 years; control ‐ 43 years
 hearing: stratified according to HL at start
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
14. Blinding (subjects) High risk not blinded
15. Blinding (outcome assessors) High risk not blinded
16. Retrospective unplanned subgroup analyses Low risk no unplanned analyses
17. Follow‐up Low risk 5‐year follow‐up
18. Statistical tests High risk ANOVA
19. Compliance Unclear risk not reported
20. Outcome measures Low risk audiometry quality reported
21. Selection bias (population) Low risk same factory
22. Selection bias (time) Low risk same time
23. Randomization High risk not randomised
24. Allocation concealment Unclear risk not randomised, not applicable
25. Adjustment for confounding High risk difference in mean age was 10 years
26. Incomplete outcome data Unclear risk not reported