Pell 1973.
Methods | CBA study Prospective | |
Participants | Various workers n = 1572 n = 628 < 20 dB hearing loss at entrance n = 559 15‐35 dB hearing loss at entrance n = 385 > 40 dB hearing loss at entrance USA 1 company | |
Interventions | Intervention: HLPP mainly hearing protection; n = 399 Control: non‐exposed colleagues; n = 1173 | |
Outcomes | Average change in hearing thresholds last‐entrance measurement at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 kHz 5‐year follow‐up | |
Notes | Long‐term Comparability ‐ intervention/control: average age: intervention ‐ 34 years; control ‐ 43 years hearing: stratified according to HL at start |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
14. Blinding (subjects) | High risk | not blinded |
15. Blinding (outcome assessors) | High risk | not blinded |
16. Retrospective unplanned subgroup analyses | Low risk | no unplanned analyses |
17. Follow‐up | Low risk | 5‐year follow‐up |
18. Statistical tests | High risk | ANOVA |
19. Compliance | Unclear risk | not reported |
20. Outcome measures | Low risk | audiometry quality reported |
21. Selection bias (population) | Low risk | same factory |
22. Selection bias (time) | Low risk | same time |
23. Randomization | High risk | not randomised |
24. Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | not randomised, not applicable |
25. Adjustment for confounding | High risk | difference in mean age was 10 years |
26. Incomplete outcome data | Unclear risk | not reported |