Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;2018(5):CD000146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub5

Hughes 1999.

Methods Country: USA (12 sites), Australia (1 site)
 Recruitment: community volunteers and referrals
Participants 1039 smokers (≥ 30 cpd) who had made a prior quit attempt, motivated to try again
 50% male, average age 43, average cpd 38
Interventions 1. 42 mg nicotine patch (24 h, 6 weeks + 10 weeks tapering)
 2. 35 mg nicotine patch
 3. 21 mg nicotine patch
 4. Placebo patch
 Level of support: high (group behaviour therapy for 7 weeks, brief individual counselling at 5 dose‐tapering meetings. Self‐help booklet)
Outcomes Prolonged abstinence at 6 months (from 2 weeks post‐quit) verified at each follow‐up visit
 (12‐month follow‐up only completed for 11/13 sites)
 Validation: CO ≤ 10 ppm
Notes All doses pooled in Analysis 1.1 against placebo
 6‐month abstinence rates used in analyses since not all centres completed 12‐month follow‐up due to sponsor termination of study. Denominators confirmed by author
 Study was funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse, ALZA and Hoechst Marion Roussel
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Subjects were randomly assigned in a double‐blind manner"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Described as "double‐blind" but no further detail
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Early termination by sponsor, resulting in incomplete long‐term follow‐up data collection. Losses were included as failures