Skip to main content
. 2018 May 31;2018(5):CD000146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub5

Niaura 1994.

Methods Country: USA
 Recruitment: outpatient settings and physician referrals (primary care subgroup)
Participants 77 low‐dependence (FTND ≤ 6) and 96 high‐dependence smokers
 50% female, average age 42, average cpd 29, FTND 4.7 for low dependence, 8.0 for high dependence
Interventions 1. Nicotine gum 2 mg, ad lib for up to 4 months (participants given prescription for gum, not free)
 2. No gum
 Level of support: high (4 individual counselling sessions and ALA self‐help treatment manuals)
Outcomes Continuous abstinence at 12 months
 Validation: saliva cotinine, or CO for gum users
Notes No placebo used. Data collapsed across dependence levels. As predicted by the study, smokers with lower dependence had lower quit rates with than without gum. The point estimate would be higher if inclusion restricted to the high‐dependence group
 Study was supported by National Cancer Institute and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Participants stratified on level of nicotine dependence. "Within each of the high‐ and low‐dependence groups, subjects were randomly assigned"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No placebo ‐ not relevant. But therapist and participant were blinded to FTQ score (level of dependency), and to match or mismatch status for gum use
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Dropout rates fully reported