Richmond 1994.
Methods | Country: Australia Recruitment: community volunteers | |
Participants | 315 smokers average cpd 29 |
|
Interventions | 1. Nicotine patch (24 h, 22 mg/24 h, 10 weeks incl tapering) 2. Placebo patch Level of support: high (group therapy) | |
Outcomes | Sustained abstinence at 12 months (reported in Richmond 1997, which also reports 3‐year follow‐up, not used in MA) Validation: CO | |
Notes | 3‐year abstinence 21/153 vs 8/152, OR 2.9 ‐ higher than at 12 months Study was funded by Marion Merrell Dow, and supported by the Drug and Alcohol Directorate, NSW Department of Health, and the Lifestyle Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Treatment and control patches were arranged in random order by Marion Merrell Dow, Sydney, then issued sequentially to patients as they attended"; married couples were assigned to same condition |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | See above |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Described as double‐blind |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Losses to follow‐up included as failures. Dropout rates fully reported |