8. Process evaluation studies ‐ summary of intervention characteristics.
Named theoretical framework | Aim | Intervention type | Control | Intensity | Included in QCA | |
Al‐Sheyab 2012a | Developmental stages (not named) | To assess feasibility in the Jordanian context of a peer‐led, school‐based asthma education programme | Triple A. Children received education through interactive teaching and learning activities | N/A | 14 hours over 6 days | Setting and participants; further modifiable design features; stakeholder involvement and engagement |
Berg 2004 | Social learning theory | To evaluate effects of the Power Breathing programme and individual coaching sessions on asthma knowledge and functional health status | Power Breathing. Children received education in a group session on asthma management | N/A | 2 weeks | Stakeholder involvement and engagement |
Bignall 2015 | None | To test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a school‐based RCT on breathing retraining for asthma outcomes and anxiety symptoms | Single workshop for children. Children received information on relaxation/breathing techniques | 30 minutes of standard asthma education | 2 face‐to‐face visits 1 month apart | None |
Brasler 2006 | None | To provide adolescents with knowledge and skills to take control of their asthma; to enhance knowledge and skills of school staff, health professionals, and parents | Power Breathing. Children received basic asthma education and addressed social/lifestyle concerns | N/A | 3× 90‐minute or 6× 45‐minute sessions | None |
Bruzzese 2004 | Self‐regulation theory | To help students weave asthma and management strategies into their self‐identity | ASMA. Students were taught how to manage their asthma to prevent symptoms and reduced quality of life. Continued medical education was also offered to medical providers | Usual care | 3 workshops 2 or 3 weeks apart for 8 weeks | Stakeholder involvement and engagement |
Bruzzese 2011 | Social cognitive theory | To test the efficacy of ASMA | ASMA; academic detailing. Students attended workshops to empower them to manage their asthma. Parents received training on how to support their child's need to manage his or her asthma | Usual care | 8‐week programme/3× 45‐minute sessions and individual coaching sessions once a week for 5 weeks | Further modifiable design features |
Bruzzese 2008 | Social cognitive theory; cognitive‐behavioural therapy | To test the feasibility and short‐term outcomes of asthma: it’s a family affair! | OAS and ASMA; caregiver education. Intervention students received education about asthma, based on existing materials, from coping with asthma at home and at school; OAS and ASMA | Usual care | 6× 75‐minute group sessions once a week for 6 weeks; caregiver 5× 90‐minute sessions once a week | Setting and participants; further modifiable design features; stakeholder involvement and engagement |
Carpenter 2016 | None | To test whether a tailored inhaler technique video intervention could be feasibly implemented by school nurses; to improve the inhaler technique of children with asthma | Multiple sessions for children. Children watched a tailored video and demonstrated their inhaler technique before and after | N/A | 6 weeks or less | None |
Cicutto 2013 | Social cognitive theory | To prepare and support children with asthma to be successful managers of their asthma, thereby reducing school absenteeism, interrupted activity, and health service use | Roaring Adventures of Puff. Workshops included goal‐setting and self‐monitoring, trigger identification, control and avoidance, basic pathophysiology, medication use, symptom recognition, and the asthma action plan, using interactive techniques | Usual care | Unclear | Setting and participants |
Crane 2014 | Educational theory of Jean Piaget | To pilot a shorter, condensed OAS education programme as an alternative, yet still effective, delivery approach compared to the lengthier original programme | OAS. Children received education from OAS | Non‐equivalent intervention | 10 weeks | Setting and participants; further modifiable design features |
Dore‐Stites 2007 | None | Unclear | OAS; Quest for the Code. Children received a computer game, home activities, and caregiver information | N/A | 20 minutes a week for 8 to 9 weeks | Further modifiable design features |
Engelke 2013 | Case management theory | To identify the process of case management used by school nurses, and when they provide case management to students with asthma. The second aim was to identify the impact of case management on parent perception of how well the child manages illness; parent perception of how well the child keeps up with school work; quality of life and academic achievement of children | Case management; nurse meetings; multiple sessions for children; multiple sessions for staff. Children received education and counselling, and parent/family education was delivered, as well as education and healthcare co‐ordination for teachers/staff | N/A | Unclear | None |
Gerald 2006 | None | To evaluate a comprehensive school‐based asthma management programme in an inner city, largely African American school system | OAS. The intervention included 3 educational programmes and medical management for children, as well as education for school staff | Usual care | Unclear | None |
Henry 2004 | Unclear | To determine whether an asthma education programme in schools would have a direct impact on student knowledge and attitudes toward asthma and quality of life of students with asthma; an indirect impact on teacher knowledge and attitudes on asthma and on school policies about asthma; and a sustainable programme after resources were withdrawn | Asthma education. A package about asthma was taught within the PD/H/PE (Personal Development, Health and Physical Education) strand of the school curriculum | Usual care | Unclear | Setting and participants |
Horner 2015 | Bruhn’s theoretical model of asthma self‐management | To test effects of 2 modes of delivering an asthma educational intervention on health outcomes and asthma management | 7‐topic curriculum. The intervention was designed for children in rural areas and included asthma information | In‐school asthma classes | 16× 15‐minute sessions for 5 weeks | None |
Howell 2005 | Learning theory and behaviour modification | To examine whether it was feasible to implement an interactive computer game at school health centres. Second, to examine whether exposure to the game was effective in increasing asthma knowledge, reducing asthma symptoms, and reducing unnecessary healthcare use compared with no exposure to the game | Quest for the Code. Computer game | Usual care | 4× 30‐minute sessions | None |
Jackson 2006 | None | To evaluate knowledge and attitude outcomes of an educational asthma programme for third grade children with and without asthma | Single sessions for children. Children completed an educational programme. Teachers were also encouraged to attend | N/A | 3 classes per session for 11 sessions | None |
Joseph 2010 | None | To develop and evaluate a multi‐media, web‐based asthma management programme | Puff City. A web‐based programme was delivered to children to focus on adherence, inhaler availability, and smoking cessation/reduction | Generic asthma websites | Unclear | Further modifiable design features; stakeholder involvement and engagement |
Joseph 2013 | Behavioural theory | To evaluate a school‐based RCT to evaluate Puff City | Adapted version of the Puff City computer programme | Generic asthma education | 4× 15‐minute sessions | None |
Kintner 2012 | Lifespan development perspective | To evaluate the feasibility of the SHARP programme for students, their family, school personnel, and community partners | SHARP; Community Coalition component | N/A | Once a week for 10 weeks plus a 3‐hour community component | Setting and participants; further modifiable design features; stakeholder involvement and engagement |
Kouba 2012 | Orem’s self‐care deficit theory | To determine the effectiveness of the ICAN programme for nutrition knowledge and dietary behaviours | Single workshop for staff; multiple sessions for children; Quest for the Code; Fight Asthma Now; additional nurse meetings; combined education | N/A | 8 weeks | None |
Langenfeld 2010 | None | Unclear | OAS; case management; stand‐alone respiratory therapy. Children received the OAS curriculum and case management asthma strategies developed with teachers | N/A | 6× 40‐minute sessions for 1 school year | None |
Lee 2011 | The functional context approach | To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of using undergraduate nursing students as facilitators to deliver an asthma management programme | OAS. Children received the OAS curriculum | N/A | Unclear | Further modifiable design features |
Levy 2006 | None | To evaluate the effectiveness of a school‐based nurse case management approach to asthma in students with poor control | OAS; monitoring of students; health status. Students received OAS education and weekly monitoring of their health status | Usual care | 1 school term | None |
Magzamen 2008 | None | To evaluate the implementation of Kickin’ Asthma | Multiple sessions for children; Kickin’ Asthma. Educational sessions, similar to the OAS curriculum. Customised letters were also sent home to describe health needs and goals for each child | N/A | 3 months | None |
McCann 2006 | None | To assess whether a school‐based intervention would produce clinical and psychological benefits for children with asthma | Education; role‐play. The intervention focused on describing the respiratory condition through a role‐play | Respiratory education | 45‐minute session | None |
Mickel 2016 | None | To provide Iggy education to more than 75% of children with asthma; To increase asthma knowledge; increase families’ awareness of asthma; and cultivate collaboration between school nurses and asthma providers | Iggy and the Inhalers intervention. Children received an asthma education video, poster, comic book, sticker, and trading card programme | N/A | Unclear | None |
Mujuru 2011 | None | To demonstrate the feasibility of a school‐based asthma education programme for students and to evaluate parents’ perspectives on the intervention | OAS. Children received the OAS curriculum | N/A | 40‐minute session once a week for 2 months | None |
Pike 2011 | None | To assess student asthma knowledge gain, teacher acceptance, and grade appropriateness after an intervention | Multiple sessions for children; integrated into the curriculum. Teachers taught lessons with information about asthma | Usual care | 7 lesson plans | Setting and participants |
Richmond 2011 | None | To increase the number of current provider‐written asthma action plans submitted to the school nurse at the beginning of the school year | Breathe Your Best. Students were encouraged to receive an asthma action plan from their doctor and to collect their prescriptions | N/A | Unclear | None |
Spencer 2000 | None | To evaluate the OAS programme for children | OAS. Children received the OAS curriculum | N/A | 6× 40‐minute sessions | None |
Splett 2006 | None | To evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of the Healthy Learners Asthma Initiative | Children received training on asthma self‐management. Licensed nurses and healthcare assistants received coaching and reinforcement from asthma resource nurses | Usual care | Varied according to asthma severity and need | None |
Terpstra 2012 | Social cognitive theory | To test a version of an intervention with a caregiver newsletter vs no newsletter | Multiple sessions for children; materials for parents. Children received skills training on how to use a peak flow meter. Parents received a newsletter about an important theme from the research | Intervention or intervention with a newsletter | 6‐week training | Setting and participants; further modifiable design features |
ASMA: Asthma Self‐Management for Adolescents.
ICAN: I Can Control Asthma and Nutrition Now.
N/A: not applicable.
OAS: Open Airways for Schools.
RCT: randomised controlled trial.
SHARP: Staying Healthy–Asthma Responsible & Prepared.
Triple A: Adolescent Asthma Action.