Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 28;2019(1):CD011651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011651.pub2

Comparison 6. Effects of school‐based asthma interventions vs usual care subgrouped by explicit use of theory.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Exacerbations leading to emergency department (ED) visits 13   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.53, 0.92]
1.1 Theoretical framework utilised explicitly 10   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.54, 1.04]
1.2 Use of theory not explicit 3   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.33, 0.97]
2 Absence from school 10   Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.07 [‐0.22, 0.08]
2.1 Theoretical framework utilised explicitly 6   Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.19 [‐0.35, ‐0.03]
2.2 Use of theory not explicit 4   Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.08 [‐0.05, 0.20]
3 Withdrawal from the study 13   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.14 [0.92, 1.43]
3.1 Theoretical framework utilised explicitly 12   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.97, 1.54]
3.2 Use of theory not explicit 1   Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.30, 1.26]