23. Intermediate solution for QCA model 1 ‐ setting and participants.

		Consistency score with subset relationship (n = 27 in each assessment)	Proportional reduction in inconsistency	Raw coverage	Unique coverage	Cases
1	HIGHSCHOOL*schoolbasedhealth*parentdirect	0.904	0.838	0.226	0.093	Al‐Sheyab 2012; Henry 2004
2	HIGHSCHOOL*SCHOOLBASEDHEALTH*teacherdirect*PARENTDIRECT	1	1	0.105	0.105	Bruzzese 2008; Terpstra 2012
3	schoolbasedhealth*teacherdirect*parentdirect*anyothdir	0.913	0.769	0.294	0.16	Crane 2014; Pike 2011
4	highschool*TEACHERDIRECT*ANYOTHDIR	0.778	0.5	0.074	0.042	Cicutto 2013
5	HIGHSCHOOL*SCHOOLBASEDHEALTH*PARENTDIRECT*ANYOTHDIR	1	1	0.074	0.042	Kintner 2012
	Solution	0.915	0.831	0.608

QCA: qualitative comparative analysis.

Overall solution

HIGHSCHOOL*schoolbasedhealth*parentdirect +

schoolbasedhealth*teacherdirect*parentdirect*anyothdir +

HIGHSCHOOL*SCHOOLBASEDHEALTH*teacherdirect*PARENTDIRECT +

(highschool*TEACHERDIRECT*ANYOTHDIR + HIGHSCHOOL*SCHOOLBASEDHEALTH*PARENTDIRECT*ANYOTHDIR)

=> SUCCESSFULIMPLEMENTATION

[Notation: Upper case = condition is present; Lower case = condition is absent; * = logical and; + logical or; Key: HIGHSCHOOL = High School (lower case not in high school); SCHOOLBASEDHEALTH = School Based Health Centre; TEACHERDIRECT = Teachers received directly received component of intervention; PARENTDIRECT = Parents directly received component of intervention; ANYOTHDIR = School nurses or other stakeholders (apart from children) directly received component of intervention; SUCCESSFULIMPLEMENTATION = Implementation of intervention successful]