Rueangweerayut 2012.
Methods | RCT Duration: 1 year, 10 months. January 2007 to October 2008 |
|
Participants | Adults and children with P falciparum malaria Number: 1271 Inclusion criteria: age 3‐60 years; bodyweight 20 kg ‐ 90 kg; fever or history of fever within 24 hours Exclusion criteria: severe/complicated malaria; anaemia (Hb < 8 g/dL); severe vomiting; diarrhoea; pregnancy/lactation; other clinically significant disorder; hepatic impairment (undefined); renal impairment; antimalarial therapy in previous 2 weeks; investigational drug in previous 4 weeks; previous participation in study; allergy to study drugs Diagnosis: thick and thin film microscopy of P falciparum (asexual parasite density 1000 mm3‐ 100,000 mm3 blood) |
|
Interventions | Randomized in a 2:1 ratio to:
|
|
Outcomes |
*Adequate clinical and parasitological response rate †Two consecutive normal readings taken between 7 and 25 hours apart ‡Not assessed in quantitative synthesis in this review |
|
Notes | Location: Asia (81%) and Africa (19%). Asia: Cambodia, India, Thailand, Vietnam. Africa: Bukina Faso, Ivory Coast, Tanzania Setting: local hospitals and health centres Malaria endemicity: high Resistance profile: in Cambodia, significantly extended parasite clearance times (for both treatment arms) were suggestive of in vivo resistance to artemisinin Source of funding: Medicines for Malaria Venture, Shin Poong Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea Follow‐up: 42 days |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer generated randomization schedule |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Individually numbered treatment packs Randomization communicated by investigator to a third party who administered the correct amount of tablets |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Unclear if patients blinded Outcome assessors blinded to group assignment |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Report lists reasons for attrition and exclusions |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Prospectively registered. Report includes all prestated outcomes of interest |
Other bias | Low risk | Some authors employed by trial sponsors, but all authors assumed responsibility for reporting accuracy |
Adverse event monitoring (detection bias) Adverse Events | Unclear risk | Authors do not describe methods for monitoring adverse events, but includes biochemical monitoring Authors do describe time point of assessments in protocol |
Incomplete adverse event reporting (reporting bias) Adverse events | Unclear risk | Report percentage of adverse events. Supplementary data table provided. Reports "any cause" adverse events if they occurred in > 2% of patients. Reports "treatment related" adverse events if they occurred in > 1% of patients. Does not report method of judging relation of adverse events to treatment |