Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 22;2018(12):CD012488. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012488.pub2

Bussone 1998.

Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial
Study grouping: parallel group
Setting: outpatient clinic
Outcome measures: State Trait Anxiety Inventory – State (STAI‐S); Pain Total Index completed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Participants Type of chronic illness: pain (headache)
Inclusion criteria: aged between 11‐15 years; satisfied the International Headache Society criteria for episodic tension‐type headache; experienced a minimum of one headache per week; neurological examination and routine laboratory tests were negative
Exclusion criteria: currently or previously receiving preventative prescribed pharmacological treatment for headache
Baseline characteristics
Overall
Number: 30
Sex (males (%)): 15 (50%)
Age in years (SD): not reported
Severity of chronic illness: at least 1 headache per week (moderate severity), mean headache
Duration in years (SD): 2.7 (2.0)
Ethnicities: not reported
Anxiety symptoms ‐ rating (SD): not reported
Social Skills Intervention
Number: 20
Sex (males (%)): 10 (50%)
Age in years (SD): 11.1 (2.6)
Severity of chronic illness: at least 1 headache per week of moderate severity
Duration in years (SD): 2.6 (2.0) years
Anxiety symptoms ‐ rating (SD): mean state anxiety 30.1 (3.4)
Anxiety symptoms ‐ category (none/subthreshold/clinical range/unsure): mild
Placebo control
Number: 10
Sex (males (%)): 5 (15%)
Age in years (SD): 13.5 (+/‐ 1.5)
Severity of chronic illness: at least 1 headache per week (moderate severity)
Duration in years (SD): 2.7 (2.0) years
Anxiety symptoms ‐ rating (SD): mean state anxiety 30.1 (5.1)
Anxiety symptoms ‐ category (none/subthreshold/clinical range/unsure): mild
Baseline differences: not described
Interventions Intervention characteristics
Biofeedback training relaxation group
Audience: child
Description of intervention: four sessions of progressive muscle relaxation training, lasting approximately 20 minutes per session. Six sessions of biofeedback training lasting 21 min and subjects were instructed not to practice relaxation at home in order to provide a pure test of in‐clinic treatment alone
Modality: not reported
Dose: 10 sessions (20 minutes each) + 4 follow‐up sessions with at least two days between any two sessions
Manualised or non‐manualised: manualised
Parent or caregiver involvement: not reported
Therapist involvement: delivery of sessions
Placebo relaxation group
Description of intervention: 10 session program (2 visits per week for 5 weeks total) where participants were instructed to remain calm and attempt to relax. EMG monitoring took place throughout as per the intervention group but no feedback was given
Modality: not reported
Dose: 10 sessions (20 minutes each) + 4 follow‐up sessions with at least two days between any two sessions
Manualised or non‐manualised: manualised
Parent or caregiver involvement: not reported
Therapist involvement: delivery of sessions
Outcomes Specific anxiety measures: State Trait Anxiety Inventory – state (STAI‐S)
Status of Long Term Physical Condition: Pain Total Index
Identification Sponsorship source: Research grant from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NS‐29855
Country: USA
Comments: n/a
Authors name: G Bussone
Institution: University of West Florida
Email: fandrasi@uwf.edu
Address: Frank Andrasik, Behavioral Medicine Laboratory, University of West Florida, 11000 University Parkway, Pensacola,FL 32514, USA.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Judgement comment: method of randomisation not clearly described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Judgement comment: method of allocation concealment not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Judgement comment: blinding of participants not clearly described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Judgement comment: blinding of outcome assessors not clearly described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Judgement comment: 5 participants dropped out and were omitted from the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Judgement comment: all collected data appears to be reported.
Other bias Low risk Judgement comment: no other sources of bias identified