Hooper 2010.
Methods | Conference abstract of a parallel‐group, RCT. Unclear if single‐ or multicentre | |
Participants | 77 participants admitted to the MICU, who met modified SIRS criteria (defined at 2 out of 4 SIRS criteria, but mandates that white blood cell count or temperature be abnormal) were enrolled into the trial. Age: not stated Gender: not stated Unclear where the trial took place, but presume USA |
|
Interventions |
Listening application: (n = not stated) programmed to monitor participants for modified SIRS criteria, that when met sends an automated notification to their ICU team Usual care (n = not stated): further information on what this group received is not stated. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | We contacted study author by email to check relationship between this study and Hooper 2011 and Hooper 2012. Email bounced back and we could not find up‐to‐date contact information. States that the abstract was funded by: a model‐integrated, guideline driven process management system for sepsis (RC1 LM10310) Declarations of interest: not stated |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | States that participants were randomized, but methods for randomization not stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No other sources of bias identified |
Other bias | Low risk | Not identified |