Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Int Conf Bioinform Biomed Workshops. 2011 Jan 28;2010:827–828. doi: 10.1109/BIBMW.2010.5703928

Table 3.

Evaluation of false positives vs. GC-percentage

Uncorrected GC1 GC2 GC3
|rLRR-GC| 0.35±0.21 0.30±0.18 0.25±0.17
FPs 444±678 236±407 155±334
ANOVA P-value = 2.34E-08
Overall FPR GC1 GC2 GC3
Uncorrected 1.1710 0.6220 0.4090
Corrected 0.0413 0.0389 0.0317

Note: GC1, GC2 and GC3 represent the three datasets with different levels of GC-percentage effect, each dataset containing 200 samples.