Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 Oct 15;34(12):1353–1362. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4361-y

Table 3:

Comparison of selected survey responses between trained and untrained trauma team providers at two-year follow-up after implementation of in situ simulation-based training for pediatric trauma resuscitation.

Two-year Follow-Up
Question Trained Providers
n=85
Untrained
Providers
n=64
p-value
I feel anxiety when participating as a member of the trauma team 2.6 (1.2) 3.1 (0.9) 0.02
I am confident playing my role in the trauma team 4.3 (0.7) 3.7 (0.9) 0.01
I feel each trauma patient is given the best possible quality of care 4.1 (0.9) 3.9 (0.8) 0.18
I feel patient needs are identified and communicated promptly 3.9 (0.8) 3.8 (0.8) 0.76
I feel comfortable addressing unexpected findings in a trauma patient 4.2 (0.7) 3.7 (0.8) 0.01
Overall team function is currently most limited by my individual skills 2.5 (1.1) 3.1 (1.1) 0.01

All values reported as mean (SD). Survey responses were scored on a 5-point Likert scale with 1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. Total providers available to complete a survey at any time point, N = 190.

Mann-Whitney U comparing trained to untrained providers.