Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):169–181. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0857-x

Table 3.

Mean (SE) Recognition Performance in Experiment 2

Concreteness
 Frequency
  Study Context Hit Rate False Alarm Rate
Concrete
 High frequency
  Isolated .626 (.02) --
  Low constraint .681 (.02) --
  High constraint .601 (.02) --
  Not presented -- .218 (.02)
 Low frequency
  Isolated .623 (.02) --
  Low constraint .691 (.02) --
  High constraint .683 (.02) --
  Not presented -- .166 (.01)
Abstract
 High Frequency
  Isolated .652 (.02) --
  Low constraint .666 (.02) --
  High constraint .636 (.02) --
  Not presented -- .253 (.02)
 Low frequency
  Isolated .674 (.02) --
  Low constraint .721 (.02) --
  High constraint .705 (.02) --
  Not presented -- .230 (.02)