Table 3.

Six-Month Remote Activity Monitoring Review Checklist Scores (N = 30)

Likert Scale: 1 = Strongly disagree; 3= Neutral; 5 = Strongly agree	Mean (SD)	Percent Agree & Strongly Agree
RAM was easy to use	3.79 (1.32)	62.0%
The information provided on how to use RAM was clear to me	4.10 (0.90)	72.4%
The needs assessment session provided by the Director of Nursing Technology was helpful	4.41 (0.80)	88.9%
The sensors of the RAM system work well in the person with memory loss’ home	3.89 (1.13)	64.3%
The Director of Nursing Technology has been helpful to me in using RAM	4.08 (1.16)	73.1%
The technology related to RAM works well	4.00 (1.18)	66.7%
After using RAM, I feel like I now have access to a service that looks as though it will meet my needs	3.71 (1.25)	64.2%
After using RAM, I feel like I was able to find a service that looks as though it will meet the person with memory loss’ needs	3.67 (1.21)	59.2%
There are financial constraints to me being able to use RAM	2.66 (1.38)	30.7%
There are time constraints to me being able to use RAM	2.62 (1.13)	23.0%
The RAM portal is simple and helpful	3.54 (0.93)	41.6%
The Director of Nursing and Technology was helpful to me in coming with a care plan	3.96 (1.00)	66.7%
The alerts provided by RAM have been helpful	3.67 (1.27)	54.2%
I felt lost using RAM	2.44 (1.23)	28.0%
I wish I would have known about RAM sooner	2.92 (1.09)	23.0%
The alerts generated by the RAM have helped prevent crises for the person with memory loss	3.13 (1.33)	34.7%
The RAM service provided me with a sufficient number of options to support me	3.71 (1.18)	57.1%
The RAM service provided me with a sufficient number of options to support the person with memory loss	3.63 (1.18)	59.2%
I am satisfied with the RAM	3.79 (1.13)	57.1%
I would recommend RAM to others in a similar situation as the person with memory loss is	4.00 (1.11)	66.7%
I would recommend RAM to others in a similar situation as I am	3.93 (1.24)	66.7%

Note: M = mean; SD = standard deviation; RAM = Remote activity monitoring