Table 2. Comparison of the most widely used ctDNA testing methodologies.
Test | Detection limit | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
Allele-specific PCR | 0.1–1% | Easy to set-up | Detection of small number of alterations per sample |
Short time to result | Lower sensitivity | ||
FDA approved/CE-IVD kits available | |||
Specific equipment not always required | |||
Low cost | |||
Digital PCR | 0.01–0.1% (49,50) | High sensitivity | Detection of small number of alterations per sample |
Short time to result | Dedicated equipment necessary | ||
Low cost of reagents | |||
Absolute quantification (copies/mL) | |||
NGS | 0.01–2% | Large coverage | Reagents more expensive |
High sensitivity (if deep sequencing methods are used) | Dedicated equipment necessary | ||
Longer turn-around time | |||
Relative quantification (allelic fraction) |
NGS, next generation sequencing.