Table 1.
Series of reported robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty cases.
| Author | Procedure | # of pts | Mean age (yrs) | Laterality UPJ | Approach | Mean op time (min) | Hospital stay (days) | Complications | Success rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kutikov et al. (15) | RALP | 9 | 0.47 | n/a | Transperitoneal | 122.8 | 1.4 | n/a | 78 |
| Avery et al. (16) | RALP | 60 | 0.61 | Bilateral (2) | Transperitoneal | 232 | 1 | 7 | 91 |
| Asensio et al. (17) | RALP | 5 | 10.59 | n/a | Transperitoneal | 144 | 2.6 | n/a | 100 |
| Olsen et al. (18) | RALP | 65 | 7.9 | n/a | Retroperitoneal | 146 | 2 | 11 | 100 |
| Minnillo et al. (19) | RALP | 155 | 10.5 | n/a | n/a | 198.5 | 1.9 | 17 | 96 |
| Singh et al. (20) | RALP | 34 | 12 | n/a | n/a | 105 | n/a | 2 | 97 |
| Atug et al. (21) | RALP | 7 | 13 | n/a | Transperitoneal | 184 | 1.2 | 1 | 100 |
| Franco et al. (22) | RALP | 15 | 11.9 | n/a | Transperitoneal | 223 | n/a | 4 | n/a |
| Perez-Brayfield | RALP | 41 | 10.2 | Right (14), Left (27) | Trans | 135 | 1.5 | 5 | 95% |