Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 30;9:952. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37255-6

Table 1.

Codes and details of larval culturing and comparisons performed in molecular analyses, plus the number of annotated transcripts up-regulated in the treated samples when searched against the (A) GenBank non-redundant and (B) Swissprot human databases.

Time Treatment A: GenBank non-redundant B: Swissprot human
2 days Ambient adults/low pH larvae CE2 204 91 (81)
Low pH for both adults and larvae E2 274 117 (109)
3 days Ambient adults/low pH larvae CE3 92 49 (43)
Low pH for both adults and larvae E3 355 153 (138)
4 days Ambient adults/low pH larvae CE4 469 315 (309)
Low pH for both adults and larvae E4 1356 764 (659)

Unique matches against Swissprot are in brackets. Treatments: In the experimental manipulations the “C” signifies ambient or control conditions of ~400 µatm; the “E” signifies low pH (~1000 µatm, denoted “E”). CE: Adults cultured under ambient conditions with larvae spawned into low pH (samples CE2-CE4); E: larvae spawned into low pH produced from adults also cultured at low pH (samples E2-E4). For the molecular analyses, the transcriptional profiles of all treated larvae were compared against a set of age-matched larvae spawned into ambient conditions produced from ambient cultured adults.