Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):CD010473. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010473.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Balanzat 2006 Not RCT. Observational study
Cesar 2017 Wrong comparison. Study compared high‐flow nasal canula with CPAP.
Chidini 2011 Wrong intervention. Study compared different methods of CPAP delivery rather than CPAP versus no CPAP.
Chidini 2015 Wrong intervention. Study compared different methods of CPAP delivery rather than CPAP versus no CPAP.
Hough 2011 Wrong intervention. Study compared different levels of CPAP produced by high‐flow nasal prongs.
Javouhey 2008 Not RCT. Retrospective study
Milési 2017 Wrong comparison. Study compared high‐flow nasal canula with CPAP.
Smith 1993 Not RCT. Study compared different levels of peak end expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated children with bronchiolitis.
Yañez 2008 Wrong intervention. Study evaluated non‐invasive ventilation rather than CPAP.

CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure
 RCT: randomised controlled trial