Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):CD012621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012621.pub2

Summary of findings 7. Mixed Pulmonary hypertension group 2 ‐ 4 ‐ PDE5i compared to placebo.

Mixed pulmonary hypertension group 2 ‐ 4 ‐ PDE5i compared to placebo
Patient or population: people with pulmonary hypertension group 2 ‐ 4
 Setting: outpatients
 Intervention: PDE5 inhibitors
 Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with placebo Risk with PDE5i
Improvement in WHO functional class Study population OR 11.31
 (4.90 to 26.14) 146
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATEa,b
137 per 1000 642 per 1000
 (438 to 806)
Six‐minute walk distance No data provided MD 51 metres higher
 (7 higher to 95 higher) 106
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATEa,b
Mortality no studies
Quality of life no studies
PASP MD 10 mmHg lower
 (11.92 lower to 8.08 lower) 146
 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATEa,b The higher the PASP, the worse the pulmonary hypertension
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; PASP: pulmonary artery systolic pressure; PDE‐5i: phosphodiesterase‐5 inhibitor; RCT: randomised controlled trials; WHO: World Health Organization
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

aDowngraded due to imprecision owing to small participant numbers.
 bThe information is from studies at low or unclear risk of bias.