Barst 2012.
Methods | Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial 16 weeks duration |
|
Participants | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
n = 234 WHO FC I/II |
|
Interventions | Three sildenafil dose levels (low, medium, and high) (total N=174) were selected to achieve maximum plasma concentrations of 47, 140, and 373 ng/mL, respectively, at steady state after oral administration 3 times a day, versus placebo (N=60) | |
Outcomes | Primary: percent change in PVO2 Secondary: change from baseline to week 16 in mPAP, PVRI, FC, cardiac index, right atrial pressure, physical and psychosocial scales of the Child Health Questionnaire–Parent Form 28 (for patients aged 5 years), and percent change from baseline in exercise duration Tertiary: Participant/parent and physician global assessments, changes in medications, and clinical worsening (defined as death, transplantation, hospitalisation due to PAH, or initiation of a prostacyclin analogue or bosentan for worsening PAH) |
|
Notes |
NCT00159913 This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Editorial support was provided by Tiffany Brake, PhD, and Janet E. Matsuura, PhD, from Compete Healthcare Communications, Inc, and was funded by Pfizer Inc Trial conducted in 16 countries (32 centers) in North, South, and Central America; Asia; and Europe between August 2003 and June 2008. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The central computer‐generated pseudo‐random code used the method of random permuted blocks within stratum (block size 4). An automated interactive voice response system assigned randomisation numbers to eligible patients". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Drug supply consisted of a list of package numbers and corresponding treatment types. A unique package number identified each package of medication. The interactive voice response system assigned patients with a package number from the list corresponding to the treatment assigned." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | As above |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Drop‐outs were accounted for |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes were reported |
Other bias | Low risk | Other bias unlikely |