Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):CD012621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012621.pub2

Barst 2012.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
16 weeks duration
Participants Inclusion Criteria:
  • Children (aged 1 – 17 years) weighing 8 kg with iPAH, PAH associated with connective tissue disease or congenital heart disease (unrepaired or partially repaired shunts with oxygen saturation at rest 88%, D‐transposition of the great arteries repaired at 30 days of life, or congenital lesions surgically repaired at 6 months) were eligible

  • PAH, defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mmHg at rest, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) ≥ 3 Wood units, confirmed by right‐heart catheterisation at baseline

  • Children with unrepaired shunts were enrolled only if their condition was considered inoperable because of their pulmonary vascular obstructive disease.


Exclusion criteria:
  • Nitrates, cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors, prostacyclin analogues, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and L‐arginine were prohibited


n = 234
WHO FC I/II
Interventions Three sildenafil dose levels (low, medium, and high) (total N=174) were selected to achieve maximum plasma concentrations of 47, 140, and 373 ng/mL, respectively, at steady state after oral administration 3 times a day, versus placebo (N=60)
Outcomes Primary: percent change in PVO2
Secondary: change from baseline to week 16 in mPAP, PVRI, FC, cardiac index, right atrial pressure, physical and psychosocial scales of the Child Health Questionnaire–Parent Form 28 (for patients aged 5 years), and percent change from baseline in exercise duration
Tertiary: Participant/parent and physician global assessments, changes in medications, and clinical
 worsening (defined as death, transplantation, hospitalisation due to PAH, or initiation of a prostacyclin analogue or bosentan for worsening PAH)
Notes NCT00159913
This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Editorial support was provided by Tiffany Brake, PhD, and Janet E. Matsuura, PhD, from Compete Healthcare Communications, Inc, and was funded by Pfizer Inc
Trial conducted in 16 countries (32 centers) in North, South, and Central America; Asia; and Europe between August 2003 and June 2008.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "The central computer‐generated pseudo‐random code used the method of random permuted blocks within stratum (block size 4). An automated interactive voice response system assigned randomisation
 numbers to eligible patients".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Drug supply consisted of a list of package numbers and corresponding treatment types. A unique package number identified each
 package of medication. The interactive voice response system assigned patients with a package number from the list corresponding
 to the treatment assigned."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk As above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐outs were accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes were reported
Other bias Low risk Other bias unlikely