Guazzi 2011a.
Methods | Randomised placebo‐controlled trial 12 months duration |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
PH was confirmed on right‐heart catheterisation n = 44 |
|
Interventions | Sildenafil (50 mg 3 times a day) (N=22) compared to placebo (N=22) | |
Outcomes | Haemodynamics, including: mean RAP, PASP, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, mean PAP, mean wedge pulmonary pressure, transpulmonary gradient, pulmonary arteriolar resistance, pulmonary arterial elastance, RV end‐diastolic pressure, RV mean systolic ejection rate, TAPSE, RV maximal short‐axis dimension, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure Quality of life, including breathlessness, fatigue, emotional function Lung function tests including FEV1, FVC, and DLCO |
|
Notes | Publicly funded Trial conducted at San Paolo Hospital in Milan, Italy, and at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA, enrolled between January 15, 2006, and December 18, 2008 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio according to computer‐generated random numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Placebo‐controlled |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Placebo‐controlled, with nursing staff checking compliance unaware of the study aims or assignment to treatment |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Not explicitly stated but assumed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Withdrawals were accounted for: Quote: "No participants in the sildenafil group was lost to follow‐up; in the placebo group, 2 participants were withdrawn at months 7 and 9 because at repeated Holter monitoring they showed persistent atrial fibrillation". |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Prespecified outcomes were reported |
Other bias | Low risk | Other risk of bias is unlikely |