Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):CD012621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012621.pub2

Hoendermis 2015.

Methods Single‐centre, randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
12 weeks duration
Participants Inclusion criteria:
  • ≥ 18 years with symptomatic HFpEF (LVEF) ≥ 45%

  • NYHA functional class II – IV)

  • PH ‐ diagnosed by mean PAP > 25 mmHg and mean PAWP > 15 mmHg, invasively measured by right‐sided cardiac catheterisation. (WHO Group 2)


Exclusion criteria:
  • Severe non‐cardiac limitation to exercise

  • Significant left‐sided valve disease

  • Other causes of pulmonary hypertension


n = 52
Interventions Sildenafil, titrated to 60 mg 3 times a day (N=26), or placebo (N=26)
Outcomes The primary endpoint was change in mean PAP after 12 weeks
 Secondary endpoints were change in mean PAWP, cardiac output, and peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2)
Notes Publicly funded
Trial conducted at University of Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein, The Netherlands, enrolled between October 2011 and September 2014
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio according to a computer‐generated random sequence to 1 of the 2 treatment groups using a block size of 4
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sildenafil and matching placebo were administered orally in tablets and were provided by Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals, were identical in appearance and were supplied to the study site in identical‐masked kits
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Placebo was used
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Placebo was used
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Withdrawals were recorded, and were even across the groups.
Quote: "One participant in the sildenafil group withdrew due to heart failure, and four discontinued due to adverse events".
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Prespecified outcomes were accounted for
Other bias Low risk Other bias is unlikely