Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;2019(1):CD006471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006471.pub4

Comparison 2. Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment and training compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement alone.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pressure ulcer incidence 1 180 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.43 [0.77, 2.68]